04-04-2010, 04:07 AM
i liked the 04s for 2 reasons:
1) let them find all the bugs and kinks in the 2003s to fix for the next year model
2) 40th Anniversary
although i honestly don't get the 40th anniversary falling on the 2004 year model (etc all the way back to any given year) as the 1964 1/2s were technically a 1965 year model car. i.e. we all know people call the first Mustang 1964 1/2 but again, technically there is no such thing.
so strictly speaking wouldn't the 2005 be the 40th anniversary.
or am i over-analyzing this too much?
1) let them find all the bugs and kinks in the 2003s to fix for the next year model
2) 40th Anniversary
although i honestly don't get the 40th anniversary falling on the 2004 year model (etc all the way back to any given year) as the 1964 1/2s were technically a 1965 year model car. i.e. we all know people call the first Mustang 1964 1/2 but again, technically there is no such thing.
so strictly speaking wouldn't the 2005 be the 40th anniversary.
or am i over-analyzing this too much?
![[-]](https://mach1club.com/images/collapse.png "[-]")
