1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428 CJ/SCJ - Ridiculously Underrated
#1
For the 1969 model year, Ford really upped the ante when it came to performance per dollar. The new 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 equipped with the 428 Cobra Jet (CJ) V8 or 428 Super Cobra Jet (SCJ) V8 had a purchase price an average buyer could afford yet had fantastic performance that was the envy of most muscle car owners.

1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428 CJ/SCJ - Ridiculously Underrated
VIDEO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRtAs6t1j9E
Reply
#2
Would definitely have to agree they were quite formidable, i've only seen a couple on the streets back then. You could tell they were all business. I wasn't a fan of the 428 for some reason? I always liked the 429 and Boss 429. Maybe cause we had 2 Tbirds a "68" and a "71" with the 429 and it was ridiculous what they were capable of, even in a roughly 6000 lbs car. Man I miss those days!!!

JTS 71 Mach1
Reply
#3
Pretty good video. I had to skip forward a few times to stop hearing the narrator say "Cobra Jet" or "Super cobra Jet".

For big block Fords, I am partial to the FE series. But I'm kind of with jts71mach1, the 428 never did anything for me. Never had one. But never got excited when seeing or hearing about one. I feel they were like the Mopar 440 and 426 Hemi motors. Extremely heavy rotating assemblies. Kind of a slow lethargic revving motor. Yeah, a lot of low end torque to spin tires. I think low end torque gives some people a sense the motor is making a lot of power throughout the entire RPM range.
Reply
#4
You're correct. I don't know why I did that. I corrected my post.
Reply
#5
I certainly wouldn't pass up a 428 especially after seeing and hearing this car run tonight. This is one of 50 Cobra Jets made. This car is 1 of 10 light weights delivered to Bob Tasca Ford. Apparently, Bob had all 10 weighed and kept the 2 lightest ones for himself. This car was one of them and was sent to Holman and Moody for race preparation.

I saw other R code 428 Mustangs tonight at a show I attended and all I have to say is I wouldn't want to change the spark plugs! Looks a little too tight for my liking.


Attached Files Image(s)
   
Reply
#6
Nice video addition!

I agree with the consensus of never being a big fan of the 428 although with the others I must admit that I have never had one either. I am sure having one would change my mind. :)
Reply
#7
(08-22-2017, 11:37 AM)Mustangmike Wrote: I certainly wouldn't pass up a 428 especially after seeing and hearing this car run tonight. This is one of 50 Cobra Jets made. This car is 1 of 10 light weights delivered to Bob Tasca Ford. Apparently, Bob had all 10 weighed and kept the 2 lightest ones for himself. This car was one of them and was sent to Holman and Moody for race preparation.

I saw other R code 428 Mustangs tonight at a show I attended and all I have to say is I wouldn't want to change the spark plugs! Looks a little too tight for my liking.

I am fortunate, at least I consider myself so, to be the owner of a '69 R code Mach 1. It was a mess that the PO had given up on mid-restoration when I bought it. The restorer took 2 1/2 years and it is a blast to drive and quite the eye catcher. And yes, the spark plug change is a project in itself. Removing and replacing the plug wires without damaging them is no small task and the plug removal/install is a nightmare on #'s 7 and 8 if your equipped with power brakes. Standard brakes may be easier.
There is a lot to be said for a high revving small block but the big block is my preference. Kind of like shooting guns. Bigger and louder is my choice. Dave R.
Reply
#8
(08-25-2017, 11:30 AM)Dave R. Wrote:
(08-22-2017, 11:37 AM)Mustangmike Wrote: I certainly wouldn't pass up a 428 especially after seeing and hearing this car run tonight. This is one of 50 Cobra Jets made. This car is 1 of 10 light weights delivered to Bob Tasca Ford. Apparently, Bob had all 10 weighed and kept the 2 lightest ones for himself. This car was one of them and was sent to Holman and Moody for race preparation.

I saw other R code 428 Mustangs tonight at a show I attended and all I have to say is I wouldn't want to change the spark plugs! Looks a little too tight for my liking.

I am fortunate, at least I consider myself so, to be the owner of a '69 R code Mach 1. It was a mess that the PO had given up on mid-restoration when I bought it. The restorer took 2 1/2 years and it is a blast to drive and quite the eye catcher. And yes, the spark plug change is a project in itself. Removing and replacing the plug wires without damaging them is no small task and the plug removal/install is a nightmare on #'s 7 and 8 if your equipped with power brakes. Standard brakes may be easier.
There is a lot to be said for a high revving small block but the big block is my preference. Kind of like shooting guns. Bigger and louder is my choice. Dave R.

The 428 engine definitely sits snug in the compartment. I was just curious if it is easier to access the difficult spark plugs from the underside of the car? I can only imagine it can be a nightmare! Back in the day, when someone brought their car in for service I am curious how many service tech's didn't replace those difficult plugs.

If I ever find an big block engine to drop in my Fairlane I would do so. There is plenty of room to do so. But right now I am going to stay on course with the 302. There are just too many expensive parts I would need to change course.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  1969 MUSTANG MACH 1 ADVERTISEMENT Mach 1 Club 4 13,560 06-03-2015, 09:38 AM
Last Post: Mustangmike
  1969 Mustang Brochure Mach 1 Club 2 10,458 09-16-2011, 10:48 AM
Last Post: Mach 1 Club
  1969 Ford Mustang "Sport-Roof" TV Ad Mach 1 Club 1 8,652 01-06-2011, 12:35 PM
Last Post: 1969jimmach
  Mach 1 Mustangs - 40 Years On Mach 1 Club 0 6,890 08-07-2010, 02:53 AM
Last Post: Mach 1 Club
  1970 MUSTANG The Year of the Boss! Mach 1 Club 0 5,928 07-20-2010, 07:05 AM
Last Post: Mach 1 Club
  1969 MUSTANG Enter the Thoroughbreds! Mach 1 Club 0 6,207 07-20-2010, 04:45 AM
Last Post: Mach 1 Club
  1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428 Cobra Jet Mach 1 Club 0 6,611 07-19-2010, 08:13 AM
Last Post: Mach 1 Club

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Latest Threads
"Jacobra"
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
06-30-2023 11:13 PM
» Replies: 86
» Views: 152588
My old Queensland Ambulance
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
06-30-2023 11:08 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 2461
New member from San Jose, CA
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
05-09-2023 08:39 AM
» Replies: 12
» Views: 4541
Saving Seatbelts
Last Post: Jim
02-19-2023 10:23 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 9321
Sourcing new wheels
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
01-25-2023 02:34 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 2193
Shaker Air Filter
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
01-08-2023 02:24 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 1685
1971 Mach 1 parting out interior parts -...
Last Post: ylwhrse
12-22-2022 01:38 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 789
Painting
Last Post: Rare Pony
12-14-2022 06:24 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 2187
WELCOME ALL NEW MEMBERS INTRODUCE YOURSE...
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
08-31-2022 01:36 PM
» Replies: 82
» Views: 159085
1970 mach 1 matching numbers
Last Post: Kstweeter
08-31-2022 10:31 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1256
Brake booster/servo hose length
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
08-23-2022 09:40 AM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 3406
New Member
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
08-20-2022 11:18 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1762
smooth window operation on 70 Mach
Last Post: CUSTOMMISER
08-15-2022 12:10 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1718
Blinkers on solid
Last Post: busted21
08-09-2022 03:58 AM
» Replies: 14
» Views: 9255
Blinkers on solid when lights on.
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
08-08-2022 12:06 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1907
351 cj running hot
Last Post: busted21
08-08-2022 12:13 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 3746
What's One More Iron In The Fire!
Last Post: Steven Harris
07-22-2022 01:39 PM
» Replies: 124
» Views: 241216
Major Winter projects
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
07-09-2022 05:12 AM
» Replies: 49
» Views: 22507
Happy Fathers Day!!!
Last Post: JTS71 Mach1
06-20-2022 02:34 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1858
1969 Raven Black 390 Looking For
Last Post: mason1958
06-11-2022 09:48 AM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 15595

>